ALA/LITA
Heads of Library Technology
(HoLT) Interest Group
ALA Annual Conference - Chicago,
Illinois
Sunday, July 12th 2009; 08:00
AM – 10:00 AM
Palmer House Dearborn 3 /
Meeting Minutes
1. Introductions
and Announcements
a. Purpose
of HoLT - The Heads of Library Technology Interest Group (HoLT) provides a
forum and support network for people with administrative responsibility for
computing and technology in a library setting. HoLT provides timely programming
for the ALA Annual Conference.
b. Introduce
Officers – present and past
i.
The current Chair – Richard Wayne led the
meeting. Vice-Chair Mark Stoffan becomes the Chair at the end of Annual
Conference
c. Our
program – ‘Content Management Systems in Libraries: Opportunities and Lessons
Learned.’ Monday @ 01:30 PM in McCormick Place South S105a-d
d. Let’s
go around the room. Attendees are as follows:
i.
Jennifer Millikan, Kirkwood Public Library
ii.
Susan Allen, Worthington Public Library
iii.
Allen Bettig, Glenview Public Library
iv.
Julian Clark, Howard County Library
v.
Marc Truitt, University of Alberta Libraries
vi.
Kevin Herrera, University of Mississippi
vii.
Mark Stoffan, Florida State University
viii.
Ed Sanchez, Marquette University
ix.
Eli Neiburger, Ann Arbor District Library
x.
Mary Ann Van Cura, Minnesota State Library
Services
xi.
Al Cornish, Washington State University
Libraries
xii.
Nackil Sung, Eastern Illinois University
xiii.
Stu Baker, Northwestern University
xiv.
Richard Wayne, UT Southwestern Medical Center
Library
e. Email
list - http://lists.ala.org/wws/info/lita-holt
f. Website
- http://www.lita.org/ala/mgrps/divs/lita/litamembership/litaigs/headsoflibtech/headslibrary.cfm
2. LITA
& HoLT Business
a. Election
for next year’s Vice-Chair position
i.
Ed Sanchez from Marquette University told the
group about his background and interests and was unanimously elected Vice-Chair
b. Future
program ideas – 2010 Midwinter in Boston, Annual in D.C.
i.
This discussion naturally evolved into our
HoLTalk discussion as we evaluated various ideas.
ii.
The idea selected for Annual Conference 2010
was System Virtualization in Libraries. Some related concepts are green
technology and cost savings. Mark Stoffan and Ed Sanchez will pursue this
program with the LITA Program Committee
3. HoLTalk
a. Potential
topics and discussion
i.
The integration of disparate library system
silos
ii.
The concept of harvesting fits in with the
silo integration puzzle. One commercial tool in this area is III’s Encore
iii.
‘Hosted services as savior or slippery slope’
was suggested as a topic. This might include content management systems (CMS),
tools, cloud computing, security issues, open source email tools such as Zimbra
iv.
We could take our past work with technology
competencies to the next level. Perhaps how to integrate online tutorials into
a self-serve learning environment
v.
The next idea was somewhat similar to
harvesting. It looked at non-ILS (integrated library system) centric search-ability
and findability
vi.
System virtualization in libraries and some
related topics was suggested. This led to quite a bit of discussion. We might present
about the benefits of virtualization and its feasibility for even very small
libraries. Perhaps hosted virtualization environments. Would people be
interested in this topic in this economy since virtualization has a price tag? Then
again, virtualization is so useful for setting up testing and development
environments. If virtualized environments become owned by the IT organization
outside the library, then the quality of systems may deteriorate. This topic is
at a pretty high ‘geek-speak’ level. However, it would present a great learning
opportunity for potential attendees. We should not shy away from HoLT’s essence
in order to gain attendance at sessions. That essence is to present high level
topics of high impact
vii.
Perhaps we could connect the ideas of
virtualization and hosted services?
viii.
What about a program on the ‘Broadband
Stimulus Initiative?’ This is a good topic, but it will probably have played
out by next annual conference
ix.
How about a program on the tug of war between
information security, functionality, and privacy?
x.
Green computing is an important concept. The
idea of sharing spare CPU cycles such as done by the SETI system
xi.
Infrastructure monitoring as done by a
program like Nagio may be an interesting topic
b. Chosen
topic discussion – After we chose the virtualization topic, some discussion
continued on further suggestions for the presentation at Annual 2010
i.
Perhaps address hosted virtualization systems
ii.
Virtualization presents a valuable test or
play area
iii.
The presenters might be selected based upon
their library size (e.g., small, medium, large) versus library type (e.g.,
public, academic, special, school)
iv.
The program idea might be approached as a
separate infrastructure or part of a larger infrastructure issue
v.
Check with UCSD and Skokie Public on ideas
related to this topic
c. Other
topics – we have a very few minutes remaining to discuss some miscellaneous
topics that had been mentioned
i.
What does the broadband initiative mean for
public library broadband initiatives in this tough economic environment? Let’s
be careful though of mixing infrastructure building with commercial interests.
We may lose sustainability when vendors become involved. That is why people in
Europe have 50 Mbps to their homes – because the infrastructure is owned by the
municipality
|