Skip to: Content
Skip to: Section Navigation
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

GPO_Electronic_Collection_final

Judith C. Russell

Managing Director, Information Dissemination (Superintendent of Documents)

U.S. Government Printing Office

Building 3, Room C801

732 North Capitol Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20401

Dear Ms. Russell,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the discussion draft of “Managing the FDLP Electronic Collection (EC).” It is essential to revise this document to reflect both new and evolving policies that have emerged in managing the EC over the past six years. The American Library Association’s Government Documents Round Table (GODORT) commends the Government Printing Office (GPO) for updating this important document. Below are some specific suggestions for further improvements to this initiative.

A lack of clear distinction between existing GPO practice and those policies and functions that remain in the planning stage, is one overall concern GODORT has with the planning document. An additional report, assessing GPO's current compliance with the EC plan, would provide the community with more assurance that digital content is currently being preserved as improved processes are developed.

We support the authentication of government information by GPO [Key Assumption #6] as discussed in section VI, “Official Status of EC Content.” It is wise to anticipate varying levels of authenticity, while ensuring that information is neither withdrawn from or never enters the Electronic Collection solely because it does not meet certain standards.

We are encouraged that GPO recognizes the importance of deploying multiple strategies to identify content for the EC. Given the diverse and uncoordinated nature of many federal agency Internet publication programs, reliance on notification and outreach with the depository community and federal agencies, while important, cannot be the only one avenue for identifying appropriate content. GPO must be aggressive in employing proactive strategies such as Web harvesting to assure all appropriate content is identified. GPO must also allocate sufficient staff resources to ensure that the large volume of information identified by web harvesting can be adequately evaluated and brought under bibliographic control.

The capture of appropriate copies for the GPO archive is an important aspect of the acquisition of publications for the EC. While GPO's current process seems to work well with static, monographic publications, it is unclear that publications issued serially or updated on an ongoing basis are being captured in their entirety and at regular intervals. After multiple issues of a newsletter are identified, cataloged, and captured by GPO, for example, is further effort made to return to the site to capture new issues as they are published? More detailed information about GPO's procedures for capturing serial and continuously updated publications is needed.

We are pleased that GPO recognizes the importance of assuring ongoing access to the publications within the EC. Section IX states that the digital copies in the GPO archive will be made available when the publication is no longer available at the publishing agency site. The dynamic nature of federal agency web sites makes the activity of tracking the availability of specific publications a difficult and labor-intensive task. Well-developed procedures and sufficient resources are absolutely essential to the success of this activity. We urge GPO to further explain its procedures and plans for resource allocation to accomplish the goals of assuring ongoing access to EC publications.

GODORT is encouraged by GPO acknowledgment of the government's obligation to preserve electronic information. We are concerned, however, about GPO’s specific plans for the preservation of digital materials, especially in light of the delay in establishing a mirror site for GPO Access. We are pleased to see language that emphasizes the necessity of establishing geographically separate locations included in the document; this language needs to be manifest in physical reality. More information about the anticipated responsibilities of FDLP partner sites is also needed.

GODORT appreciates the opportunity to comment on this revised edition of the ‘Managing the FDLP Electronic Collection’ document. We recognize the challenge in identifying, acquiring, providing access to, and preserving electronic information and affirm our commitment to work with GPO in revising this document to incorporate new and update existing policies

Sincerely,

John A. Stevenson

Chair, Government Documents Round Table

Coordinator, Government Documents and Maps Processing Unit

University of Delaware Library

181 S. College Ave.

Newark, DE 19717-5267